Best Selection for Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)/ 18-200 vr Deals Lowest Prices & Special Discount!!!
Best on choosing the BEST Buy / Sale / New or Used & Recommended
Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)
18-200 vr
cheapest deals price black friday's deals and discount
CHECK NOW for LOWEST PRICES TODAY!!!
Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)
18-200 vr for SALES ONLINE BLACK FRIDAY DEALS 2011-CHECK SPECIAL PRICES!!! ...
D1) NIKON D700 FX FORMAT BODY ONLY.../ Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only) / 18-200 vr
- 12.1-megapixel FX-format (23.9 x 36mm) CMOS sensor; body only
- 3.0-inch, 920,000-dot VGA color monitor; 170-degree wide-angle viewing and tempered-glass protection
- Fast, accurate 51-point AF system; 3D Focus Tracking and two Live View shooting modes
- Base ISO range from 200-6400 can be expanded to range from ISO 100 (Lo-1) to 25,600 (Hi-2); 0.12-second start-up speed
- Capture images to CF I/II cards; compliant high-speed UDMA CF cards that will enable recording speeds up to 35 megabytes/second
BEST DEALS Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)
18-200 vr for BLACK FRIDAY DEALS 2011 SHOPPING...
Product Brand : Nikon | Model : D700 Body
Product Rating : |
 |
Popular Rating : |
|
Reviews Rating : |
|
Customer Rating : |
|
Available : In Stock
Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)
18-200 vr
Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought......
Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)
18-200 vr for ALL BUY BEST BLACK FRIDAY 2011 BEST SELLER!!!
18-200 vr
Special for BLACK FRIDAY best price products
Customer Review :
A quote of the Nikon D700 by a Nikon D300 owner : Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)
The Nikon D700 is exactly the digital Slr that I envisioned when I first heard that such an animal existed. After over a quarter-century of shooting film and gently realizing the advantages digital holds for me straight through using a high-end point-and-shoot as an adjunct to my specific old Nikon Slr film camera, I eagerly bought a D70s ... And was exceedingly frustrated and disappointed. My familiar old lenses responded differently (the 1.5 "multiplier effect") ... When they responded at all (a "non-Cpu" lens could be mounted, but all camera exposure and metering functions were disabled, manufacture the corollary disadvantageous even compared to a pre-Af film body and lens).
Not any more! Even though the D700 was primarily intended to be used with auto-focusing (Af) lenses, it also functions superbly with my non-Cpu (manual focus) lenses, only losing the "shutter priority" and "program" modes (because, of course, the camera can't alter the aperture ... That's my job on any non-Cpu lens) ... The D700 can even give me focusing feedback after I enter a hand-operated lens's data into the D700's menu. I once more feel like I have good, quick operate over the aspects of photography that generate the character of my photographs. No more fumbling with lots of fingers over any sets of buttons to tell the camera the simplest things ... It's back to rotating the focus and aperture rings (or not, if I select the Af lenses).
And the annoying "multiplier effect" is gone with the D700's full-frame ("Fx") sensor. My 50mm lens -- my mainstay -- is now a true 50mm lens again (if you have to ask why that matters, the D700 isn't for you). I personally don't pursue wide-angle photography, but I right on can see how those who do (and who haven't been able to afford a D3) will be doing cartwheels if they can get their hands on a D700.
The D700's viewfinder is also light years above my D70s, manufacture all things from focusing to combination that much easier and more precise. The D700's whopping big Lcd screen is also a big advantage. When in quote mode, the display is large ... Or, at my choice, the increased data choice shrinks the thumbnail to a still-valuable size and places the data nearby the photo instead of over it like the D70s does.
I'm seeing the grip very comfortable, and although the weight is hefty compared to any point-and-shoot, it is a well-balanced camera and that weight doesn't bother me. Being able to shoot in Raw mode is resulting in not only best end-result photos for me, but also (once I get the Raw files on my computer) much more correct feedback on what I can enhance about my technical choices ... And one of digital photography's most valuable advantages is that faster feedback. Also of note for those who like working in Raw, unlike the D70, I now have the choice to shoot Only in Raw mode, not just Raw + Jpeg, and that saves valuable memory space.
My only negative annotation so far is that Nikon's possession software (included with the D700) is valuable to download photos to one's computer. I'll adapt, but it just seems an unnecessary restriction.
Even though it's priced well under the other full frame Nikon, the D3, the D700 certainly does not come cheap. For me, it was the only affordable solution, and well worth every penny. If you spent years shooting film and count a bundle of old Nikon lenses among your close friends, the D700 is going to make you wonder if you'll ever stop grinning!
***
Update, November 21, 2008: I've had the D700 for three months now. Three months isn't a long time to rate durability, and I'm certainly not one of those people who shoots 1000 or more captures a week (I still have thrifty film habits), but early use is one of the base timeframes for potential problems to surface. I'm certainly pleased that I've experienced no problems with the camera's function.
The D700 continues to exceed my expectations as a camera and as a true successor to my film camera. It has put the fun back into photography for me -- once set up to my preferences, the D700 stays out of my way and lets me photograph the way I have for decades, with the pleasing results I'm used to getting ... And with all the advantages of digital capture. Despite my miserly film-born habits, I've happily made enough digital images to catalogue for practically half the camera body's buy price if those captures were translated to film and developing.
Now that I've established a workflow (Nikon transfer to Adobe Bridge Cs3 to Photoshop Cs3), having to use Nikon transfer for downloading images is a non-issue at home. On the road, though, I'll have to wait until returning to my own computer (with the Nikon transfer software) to see my pics, so this is still a exact limitation.
What has totally blown my mind is the D700's doing in low light. I never anticipated high Iso captures to be so useable, let alone what I've gotten at Iso 6400. I'm shooting in the house with ambient lighting and no flash and certainly getting a high percentage of "keepers"! No longer do I shrug and say "too bad, not enough light" nor does a flash disturb my branch and alter or destroy the mood. I've also found I can capture good images at indoor events and competitions (such as llama and horse shows) without flash, manufacture my proximity a non-issue instead of a inherent disruption. As a result, the D700 has given me a brand new chance to capture a valuable segment of my world in pixels.
No, Iso 6400 image potential is not equivalent to Iso 200, nor is it often certainly favorable for 100% size printing or display (11.8"x17.7"). But for smaller prints and display (in the 25-50% range), it's remarkable, and certainly excellent to whatever I could maybe have captured with any other Dslr (besides the D3, which has the same sensor), let alone on film (because I primarily shoot nature outdoors, I never could justify loading any film higher than Iso 400 in my Nikon Fe). I have never in my life had whatever printed larger than 8x12 with one exception, and ordinarily I've not even printed that large, so the limitations on the D700's Iso 6400 are minimal for me (and what it can do is still not achievable otherwise). To see some actual samples, you're welcome to go to my Flickr photostream (http://www.flickr.com/photos/fishingcat) and hunt for photos tagged with Nikon D700 and Iso 6400, or just hunt for Nikon D700 and look at the Exif data for the resulting photos if you prefer. Unless the photo is also tagged with "noise ninja", it has No noise reduction (I'm from film, remember -- minimal digital post-processing skills at this time!. If you have and use noise-reduction software, you already know what additional improvements can be made in the dark areas of the captures.
I do have one new quibble with the D700 -- I wish Nikon had not small the non-Cpu lens menu to only ten lenses. Because I'm coming from years of relieve with shooting hand-operated focus lenses on film, that's what I do on the D700 ... And as a result, I've got all ten slots full! If I want to use a teleconverter (or if I collect any other hand-operated focus lenses), I have to re-program one or more of the slots. Hopefully Nikon will provide a firmware update to address this, although I'm not holding my breath either. certainly a huge percentage of people love their autofocus lenses; the interrogate and financial return to Nikon for such an update probably isn't valuable from a marketing standpoint.
I'm also seeing that it would have been more logical for the Auto-Iso setting to be available straight through the dedicated Iso button instead of in the shooting menu. Again, a inherent firmware update could address this ... If Nikon feels it's warranted. It's not impossible to work around, just less favorable than it could be. I'm not sure if other currently available Dslrs share this arrangement or not.
Initially I would have said that those people who started photography with Dx format (or who converted to digital years ago) would not see any major advantage in the D700. Now I'm not so sure.
Certainly whatever who has only Dx lenses would be financially impacted by also needing to buy good full-frame lenses to certainly advantage from the D700's full-frame capabilities; whatever whose preferences consist of telephoto and wildlife photography will also be disadvantaged by losing the "reach" that the 1.5x Dx multiplier provides if they sell their current Nikon Dslr to finance a D700. (You can use Dx lenses on the D700, but they use a smaller quantum of the sensor, resulting in a lower Mp image ... Hardly a cheap use of a $2.5K+ camera.)
However, for low ambient light photography, the D700 has no equal (other than the significantly more costly D3). Before experiencing what the D700 can do, I said, "Well, I don't certainly use high Iso, so I don't need that capability." Now that I have the capability, I'm certainly using it, and I wouldn't give it up for anything.
Fortunately, even if the choice is not entirely clear-cut, the choices Are there. Thank you, Nikon!!!
VIEW GREAT PRODUCT & BEST PRICES..CAN CHECK UPDATE LOWEST PRICES & DISCOUNT!!! ABOUT Nikon D700 12.1MP FX-Format CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3.0-Inch LCD (Body Only)
::18-200 vr::CHEAPEST ON LINE DEALS...
!!!!!~~CHECK HERE NOW~~!!!!!
Buy-Archery Release Aids-Sport Shop Best Buy 1 Vase For Your Home Garden